Re: AW: AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AW: AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments
Date
Msg-id 6985.973270789@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at> writes:
>> Right.  So what do you think about a hint that takes the form of a SET
>> variable for the fetch percentage to assume for a DECLARE CURSOR?

> Since we don't have other hints that are embedded directly into the SQL
> that sounds perfect. 

> The not so offhand question for me is whether to use this percentage
> for non cursor selects also. Imho both should (at least in default)
> behave the same.

Not at all, since in a non-cursor select you *must* retrieve all the
data.  I can't see any reason to optimize that on any other basis than
total execution time.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with 2 avcuums in parallel