Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date
Msg-id 6984.1550937657@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> I think we're better off just peventing the explicit drop of a temp schema.
> See attached?

I think this is a poor implementation of a bad idea.  Would you like a
list of the ways a superuser can break the system?  We could start with
"DELETE FROM pg_proc;".

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash