Re: Query that took a lot of time in Postgresql when not using trim in order by

From: Tom Lane
Subject: Re: Query that took a lot of time in Postgresql when not using trim in order by
Date: ,
Msg-id: 6979.1448819916@sss.pgh.pa.us
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Query that took a lot of time in Postgresql when not using trim in order by  ("Peter J. Holzer")
List: pgsql-performance


"Peter J. Holzer" <> writes:
> Seems plausible. Also I'm wondering what CPU this is: 36 seconds for an
> in-memory sort of 900k rows seems slow to me.

I'm wondering if it's textual data in some locale whose strcoll() behavior
is exceptionally slow.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-performance by date:

From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Query that took a lot of time in Postgresql when not using trim in order by
From: Glyn Astill
Date:
Subject: Re: Index scan cost calculation