> On 9 Sep 2022, at 11:00, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 9, 2022, at 5:53 PM, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> Note that the grammar has shift-reduce conflicts.
> Looks like the last rule for Filters should not be there.
Correct, fixed in the attached.
> I do wonder whether we should be using bison/flex here, seems like using a
> sledgehammer to crack a nut.
I don't the capabilities of the tool is all that interesting compared to the
long term maintainability and readability of the source code. Personally I
think a simple Bison/Flex parser is easier to read and reason about than the
corresponding written in C.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
