"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 20:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So we really don't have any methodically-gathered evidence about the
>> effects of different stats settings. It wouldn't take a lot to convince
>> us to switch to a different default, I think, but it would be nice to
>> have more than none.
> I don't this is not empirical but really, 150 is very reasonable. Let's
> just set it to that by default and be done with it.
What happened to the "more than zero evidence" part of the discussion?
regards, tom lane
