Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date
Msg-id 692bed6e-d86f-094b-11ab-9d4ccc2c802a@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/6/23 15:15, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 14:11 -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
>> This discussion makes me wonder (though probably too late for the v16
>> cycle) if we shouldn't treat "C" and "POSIX" locales to be a third 
>> provider, something like "internal".
> 
> That's exactly what I did in v6 of this series: I created a "none"
> provider, and when someone specified provider=icu iculocale=C, it would
> change the provider to "none":
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5f9bf4a0b040428c5db2dc1f23cc3ad96acb5672.camel%40j-davis.com
> 
> I'm fine with either approach.

Ha!

Well it seems like I am +1 on that then ;-)

-- 
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction