Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?
Date
Msg-id 6903.1416241481@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?  (Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?  (Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de> writes:
> In HEAD, there's this WARNING now:
> WARNING:  type input function chkpass_in should not be volatile

Yeah, that's intentional.

> IMHO built-in functions (even if only in contrib) shouldn't be raising
> warnings - the user can't do anything about the warnings anyway, so
> they shouldn't get notified in the first place.

The point is to find out how many people care ...

> (Catched by Debian's postgresql-common testsuite)

... and by "people", I do not mean test suites.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: using custom scan nodes to prototype parallel sequential scan
Next
From: Steve Singer
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding - reading a user catalog table