table size is bigger than expected - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jian Shi
Subject table size is bigger than expected
Date
Msg-id 68B6AA6E4AA4D840865FAB5BEC6707C108183089@UNIATLEX2010.unitrends.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: table size is bigger than expected  (Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>)
Re: table size is bigger than expected  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
List pgsql-performance

Hey,

 

  I’m a new user of PostgreSQL. I found one of my tables is taking unexpectedly large space:

 

select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('archive_files'));                                                                     

 pg_size_pretty

----------------

1113 MB

The structure of this table is like:

   Column   |       Type        | Modifiers

------------+-------------------+-----------

archive_id | integer           | not null

dir_no     | integer           | not null

fname      | character varying | not null

type       | smallint          | not null

size       | bigint            | not null

mod_date   | integer           | not null

blocks     | bigint            | not null

blk_offset | bigint            | not null

 

the field “fname” stores file names without any directory names. In our case, each record is expected to take around 300 bytes.

 

However, this table contains 934829 records, which means each record takes about 1.2KB.

 

I did vaccum, reindex, the size is still the same. Is there anything else that I can do?

 

Thanks!

 

John

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Samuel Gendler
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to tune for Heavy Write
Next
From: Claire Chang
Date:
Subject: Postgres 8.4 memory related parameters