Re: User Defined Types in Java - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: User Defined Types in Java
Date
Msg-id 687.1139495096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to User Defined Types in Java  (Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>)
Responses Re: User Defined Types in Java
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se> writes:
> I'd like to enable UDT's written in Java

Does Java really give you enough control over the bit-level
representation of an object for this goal to be considered sane?

In particular, it seems unsafe to use a Java class as a PG UDT,
because the method pointers wouldn't remain the same across
backend runs.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema search for default operator classes (was: [ADMIN] Cross schema Primary Key Indexes problem with datatype in the public schema)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: User Defined Types in Java