Re: Application name patch - v4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Application name patch - v4
Date
Msg-id 6865.1259698711@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v4  (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Application name patch - v4
List pgsql-hackers
Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> No, at least both pgbouncer and pgpool consider only (username, database)
> pair as pool identifier.  Rest of the startup params are tuned on the fly.
> And I think that should stay that way.

If you're happy with handling the existing connection parameters in a given
way, why would you not want application_name behaving that same way?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks