Re: [HACKERS] Increase pltcl test coverage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Increase pltcl test coverage
Date
Msg-id 685b4b23-6d5d-f302-6c4c-5c009b2cf368@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Increase pltcl test coverage  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Increase pltcl test coverage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/31/16 3:24 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> This patch increases test coverage for pltcl, from 70% to 83%. Aside
> from that, the work on this uncovered 2 new bugs (the trigger return one
> I just submitted, as well as a bug in the SRF/composite patch).

Rebased patch attached. Test coverage is now at 85% (by line count).

Original patch by Karl Lehenbauer. Work sponsored by FlightAware.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] gettimeofday is at the end of its usefulness?
Next
From: Andreas Seltenreich
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] Crash reading pg_stat_activity