Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id 685ab899-6fcb-3fdd-cd7f-d549da1218e0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018/03/20 13:30, Amit Langote wrote:
> I have incorporated your patch in the main patch after updating the
> comments a bit.  Also, now that 6666ee49f49 is in [1], the transition
> table related tests I proposed yesterday pass nicely.  Instead of posting
> as a separate patch, I have merged it with the main patch.  So now that
> planner refactoring is unnecessary, attached is just one patch.

Sorry, I forgot to remove a hunk in the patch affecting
src/include/optimizer/prep.h.  Fixed in the attached updated version.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.