Re: new heapcheck contrib module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date
Msg-id 684773.1603721595@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new heapcheck contrib module  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: new heapcheck contrib module  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:56 AM Mark Dilger
> <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> hornet is still unhappy even after
>>> 321633e17b07968e68ca5341429e2c8bbf15c331?

>> That appears to be a failed test for pg_surgery rather than for amcheck.  Or am I reading the log wrong?

> Oh, yeah, you're right. I don't know why it just failed now, though:
> there are a bunch of successful runs preceding it. But I guess it's
> unrelated to this thread.

pg_surgery's been unstable since it went in.  I believe Andres is
working on a fix.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression