Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Problem with factorial operator - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Problem with factorial operator
Date
Msg-id 6842.1019107555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem with factorial operator  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Problem with factorial operator  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Factorial work up to 20. After that one gets negative results.

> I changed the docs to do a 20!.

Don't we have a TODO item to replace the existing factorial functions
with a NUMERIC implementation?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Java as PG Procedural Language
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc error? was: Why does this not work? (keyword 'TEXT')