Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
Date
Msg-id 68414442-40C5-45E0-82D0-88CC1A383A03@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 6 Jul 2020, at 14:58, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> wrote:

> as far as rebase -i do what is advised here for squashing them. Just one patch now ?

One patch per logical change, if there are two disjoint changes in the patchset
where one builds on top of the other then multiple patches are of course fine.
My personal rule-of-thumb is to split it the way I envision it committed.

cheers ./daniel


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?