Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date
Msg-id 683A5DCD-53A6-4515-94F5-25336B58E5E8@kcilink.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Responses Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
List pgsql-general
On Nov 12, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Sam Mason wrote:

> You only need a 64bit address space when each process wants to see
> more
> than ~3GB of RAM.

And how exactly do you get that on a 32-bit CPU?  Even with PAE
(shudders from memories of expanded/extended RAM in the DOS days), you
still have a 32-bit address space per-process.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicating a table row while honouring key constraints
Next
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance