Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
Date
Msg-id 6793.1501446928@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?  ("Tels" <nospam-pg-abuse@bloodgate.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
List pgsql-hackers
"Tels" <nospam-pg-abuse@bloodgate.com> writes:
> On Sun, July 30, 2017 12:22 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I looked into that.  The closest candidate I can find is that
>> perl 5.10.1 contains Test::More 0.92.  However, it's not real clear
>> to me exactly which files I'd need to pull out of 5.10.1 and inject into
>> an older tarball --- the layout seems a lot different from a standalone
>> package.

> So basically the two files:
> http://search.cpan.org/src/EXODIST/Test-Simple-1.302086/lib/Test/More.pm
> http://search.cpan.org/src/EXODIST/Test-Simple-1.302086/lib/Test/Builder/Module.pm
> might do the trick.

Thanks for the hint.  I transplanted these files out of a 5.10.1
tarball into 5.8.3, then built as usual:
lib/Test/Simple.pm
lib/Test/More.pm
lib/Test/Builder.pm
lib/Test/Builder/Module.pm
The result seems to work, although it fails a few of 5.8.3's tests,
probably because I didn't copy over the relevant test scripts.
It's good enough to run PG's tests though.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL not setting OpenSSL session id context?
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows