Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com> writes:
> Having just sent two messages to the discussion about the wrong patch, I'll
> apologize, and shut up now :)
No need to apologize --- this really is, and should be, all one
conversation. I think the main problem I've got with applying either
patch is that I don't believe we have consensus on the direction the
logging code should go. Without that, it's a bad idea to accept
incremental patches, even if they're arguably harmless by themselves.
regards, tom lane
