Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++
Date
Msg-id 66c291ff-8b53-d240-ea7f-3370372bfd39@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/20/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 12/20/17 00:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I do not have a well-informed opinion on whether
>>> #if defined(__cpp_static_assert) && __cpp_static_assert >= 200410
>>> is an appropriate test for static_assert() being available, but I'm
>>> pretty suspicious of it because none of my C++ compilers seem to
>>> take that path, not even recent stuff like clang 9.0.0.
> 
>> For clang, you apparently need to pass -std=c++11 or higher.  With g++
>>> =6, that's the default.
> 
> Ah.  I did try -std=c++0x on one machine, but forgot to do so with
> the newer clang.  That does seem to make it take the static_assert
> path on recent macOS.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
Date:
Subject: Re: Does PostgreSQL check database integrity at startup?
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Does PostgreSQL check database integrity at startup?