Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Verite
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date
Msg-id 66ab30f4-0f0f-41ff-925b-5bbbafcad678@manitou-mail.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
    Craig Ringer wrote:

> The kernel will usually do some packet aggregation unless we use
> TCP_NODELAY (which we don't and shouldn't)

Not sure. As a point of comparison, Oracle has it as a tunable
parameter (TCP.NODELAY), and they changed its default from
No to Yes starting from their 10g R2.


Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] TRUE and true
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regarding Postgres Dynamic Shared Memory (DSA)