Hi Merlin,
We are moving up to a larger testbed, and are planning to use 9.2. But the results will not comparable to our 8.4
resultsdue to differences in hardware. But that comparison is a useful one. I'll try for a quick test on the new
hardwarewith 8.4 before moving to 9.2.
Thanks,
Reza
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:mmoncure@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:06 PM
> To: Reza Taheri
> Cc: Greg Smith; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] The need for clustered indexes to boost TPC-V
> performance
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Reza Taheri <rtaheri@vmware.com> wrote:
> > Just to be clear, we have a number of people from different companies
> working on the kit. This is not a VMware project, it is a TPC project. But I
> hear you regarding coming in from the cold and asking for a major db engine
> feature. I know that I have caused a lot of rolling eyes. Believe me, I have
> had the same (no, worse!) reaction from every one of the commercial
> database companies in response to similar requests over the past 25 years.
>
> No rolling of eyes from me. Clustered indexes work and if your table access
> mainly hits the table through that index you'll see enormous reductions in
> i/o. Index only scans naturally are a related optimization in the same vein.
> Denying that is just silly. BTW, putting postgres through a standard non
> trivial benchmark suite over reasonable hardware, reporting results,
> identifying bottlenecks, etc.
> is incredibly useful. Please keep it up, and don't be afraid to ask for help
> here. (one thing I'd love to see is side by side results comparing 8.4 to 9.1 to
> 9.2).
>
> merlin
