Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Date
Msg-id 665338.1732306066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
List pgsql-bugs
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> I think we'll also want to do something about MyProcPort->database_name

Huh, isn't that getting filled from InitPostgres's out_dbname?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails