Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date
Msg-id 6640.1063340242@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Right, though I am not sure people will know _slow_ configuration vs.
>> PostgreSQL is slow.

> No, but definitely something for those discussion performance to add
> to their checklist :)

> BTW, post-compile, running system ... how do you check this?  Or can you?

If we force people to give a --without-spinlocks config option to build
that way, then `pg_config --configure' will reveal the dirty deed ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines