Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
>> Anyone see something I missed? Tatsuo, what exactly should the function
>> signature really be for all those encoding conversion functions you just
>> added?
> test=# \df iso8859_1_to_utf8
> List of functions
> Result data type | Schema | Name | Argument data types
> ------------------+------------+-------------------+---------------------------------
> integer | pg_catalog | iso8859_1_to_utf8 | integer, integer, -, -, integer
Right, that's what they are now, but what do the "-" entries really
mean? Also, are the "integer" args and result truthful, or do they
really mean something else?
regards, tom lane
