Re: Numeric 508 datatype - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date
Msg-id 6605.1133554529@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Numeric 508 datatype  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Numeric 508 datatype
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Actually, no.  If I cut'n paste the number from psql to
> cat > foo
> <shift> <insert>
> then only 4096 chars are copied.  (Amusingly, I can't add a newline to
> ^D and close the file.  I must delete one char to do that.)

Hmm, cut buffer limitation in X or someplace?  I definitely get the
right number of characters into the file written with \g, and what looks
like a reasonable number of screensful of plain psql output.  If Bruce
is seeing the right number of dashes and the wrong number of data
characters in his \g output then *something* is pretty weird there.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?