20.02.2024 07:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Could you please name functions, which you suspect, for me to recheck them?
>> Perhaps we should consider fixing all of such functions, in light of
>> b0f7dd915 and d57b7cc33...
> Looks like the second commit has fixed all other places I knew except
> Identity related functions. So worth fixing identity related functions
> too. I see
> dropconstraint_internal() has two calls to check_stack_depth() back to
> back. The second one is not needed?
Yeah, that's funny. It looks like such a double protection emerged
because Alvaro protected the function (in b0f7dd915), which was waiting for
adding check_stack_depth() in the other thread (resulted in d57b7cc33).
Thank you for spending time on this!
Best regards,
Alexander
