> On Jul 5, 2026, at 21:36, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2026 at 10:24 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I thought postgres_fdw was where we interact with the remote server, while analyze_rel() is the code deciding that
ANALYZEsucceeded. Ideally, cumulative ANALYZE reporting would be driven from that level, not from an FDW callback
implementation.
>
> The division of labor would be arbitrary: as mentioned upthread, the
> FDW callback is designed as a function corresponding to
> do_analyze_rel(), which not only updates the stats system catalogs but
> reports to pgstats, so I think it's appropriate for the callback to do
> the report as well.
>
>> But I understand your concern about changing the ImportForeignStatistics API, so I’m fine with your proposal. I have
integratedyour changes into v2.
>
> Ok, thanks for the integration!
>
> @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ analyze_rel(Oid relid, RangeVar *relation,
> if (fdwroutine->ImportForeignStatistics != NULL &&
> fdwroutine->ImportForeignStatistics(onerel, va_cols, elevel))
> stats_imported = true;
> - else
> +
> + if (!stats_imported)
>
> Is this a leftover?
>
Ah, yes, that’s a leftover. Reverted that in v3.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/