Re: Fix SET EXPRESSION for virtual columns with whole-row dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chao Li
Subject Re: Fix SET EXPRESSION for virtual columns with whole-row dependencies
Date
Msg-id 65A70B05-E682-48AE-9EB2-D62ADBFB35D1@gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Fix SET EXPRESSION for virtual columns with whole-row dependencies  (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fix SET EXPRESSION for virtual columns with whole-row dependencies
List pgsql-hackers

> On Jun 13, 2026, at 10:42, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 5:06 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> After reading the other implementation in [1], I realized that I had missed the partial-index case, so I added
coveragefor that. 
>>
>> I am still sending an updated version of this patch because my implementation is different from the one in [1]. I
wouldlike people to compare the two approaches and decide which direction is better. 
>>
>
> I tried your patch before but abandoned it due to many regression test failures.
>

Thanks for looking. But I wonder which tests I missed?

I ran “make check-world” locally and passed. The CI tests all passed on the CF:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6867/

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuya Kawata
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_stat_lock: add blocker mode dimension
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual