Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Date
Msg-id 6594.1365528881@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized  ("Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>)
Responses Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
List pgsql-hackers
"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's conceivable that updating to something more current than 9.0.4
>> would get you out of this --- we've fixed quite a number of WAL replay
>> bugs in the last two years.

> I see that there is a 9.0.13, but that would be a source upgrade, since Debian
> doesn't provide later than 9.0.4 AFAICS.

That's a bit hard to believe, especially given that 9.0.13 fixes a
rather major security bug.  Any packager that isn't offering something
more current than 9.0.4 is *seriously* misfeasant.

> I suppose upgrading to 9.1.9 is not recommended in this state, or is it?

You can't -- only a 9.0.x server will even try to start up against this
DB.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg"
Date:
Subject: Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized