Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Date
Msg-id 65937bea0812072154v71e1f698g4c788330fb710a2d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
List pgsql-general
As I read it, he is supportive of the community process that PG follows; I am not so sure he promotes Postgres though :)

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
Jason Long wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
> > I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for
> > reference in case it gets forcibly removed...
> >
> > Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant
> > a 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have
> > guessed that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for
> > me?
> >
> > --
> > * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
> >
> I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have
> transactions and subqueries were not existent.  The features I was
> looking for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.
>
> I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.

Monty is quite supportive of Postgres.

--
 Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
 EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



--
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com

EnterpriseDB      http://www.enterprisedb.com

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Dot Yet"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unique constaint violated without being violated
Next
From: Tomasz Ostrowski
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared statement already exists