Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 65937bea0805301418j294d8fc2g49a1559a5e8593ba@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:

Then you ship 16 MB binary stuff every 30 second or every minute but
you only have some kbyte real data in the logfile.

Not if you use pg_clearxlogtail ( http://www.2ndquadrant.com/replication.htm ), which got lost in the giant March commitfest queue but should probably wander into contrib as part of 8.4.

This means we need to modify pg_standby to not check for filesize when reading XLogs.

Best regards,

--
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com

EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Shouldn't Natural JOINs Follow FK Constraints?
Next
From: David E. Wheeler
Date:
Subject: Shouldn't Natural JOINs Follow FK Constraints?