Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?
Date
Msg-id 656221.1604334677@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?  (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?  (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> writes:
> While I’m waiting for my devs to confirm the first table that I partitioned is working correctly, I started working
onsecond of three that I need to do. So, I added the code to end of my original script, but there was a typo in it.
Now,as this code runs in a transaction block, so I don’t think anything it created should actually be present in the
database,but on a subsequent rerunning, I got an error that one of the partition tables actually exists already.
However,I cannot see it, nor drop it from the server. The error in the script is: relation
“temp_my_second_table_global”already exists, but the system cannot see it in order to drop it, saying
“temp_my_second_table_global”does not exist. That’s really a catch-22. Is there a system table where I can look and
maybedrop it from there directly? 

Kinda sounds like a confusion over search_path, ie script is creating
table in some schema that's not in your interactive search path?

In psql, try
   \d *.temp_my_second_table_global
to see instances of temp_my_second_table_global in all schemas.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: John Scalia
Date:
Subject: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?
Next
From: John Scalia
Date:
Subject: Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?