Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start
Date
Msg-id 6547.1315837883@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> I started work on proposed check statement option and there are a few questions?

> what is sense of this statement for others PL?

IMO you should design this as a call to the PL's validator function.
It's not necessary to make other PLs do anything more than their
existing validators do (at least for now).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to improve reliability of postgresql on linux nfs