Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Jon Jensen writes:
>> I hate to mention it, but would it be useful/non-overkill to make either
>> of those things (context message maximum length and funny character
>> escaping) configurable somehow?
> I'm thinking the same. We have conflicting needs of different groups:
> Users on "real" Unix platforms converting old data need the checks, users
> on Windows platforms with new data don't want them. (I wonder what people
> on Mac OS that mix Unix-style and native applications would want.)
I wouldn't object to adding a GUC variable that turns off the
mixed-newlines error (as long as it defaults to enabled ;-)).
Our intention to remove the check in the future might then reduce
to simply flipping the factory default for this variable.
regards, tom lane
