Re: pgFoundry Download URLs - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Date
Msg-id 64ccaa9f9a92336fec247b30b71013c5@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgFoundry Download URLs  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Responses Re: pgFoundry Download URLs  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
Re: pgFoundry Download URLs  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----                           
Hash: RIPEMD160                                              


>> There's also a 2nd advantage to having the PG accessory project mostly
>> hosted elsewhere: it makes us more visible to outside communities.    
>                                                                        
> and makes it harder to aggregate them back into a canonical            
> search/aggregator which is what some people want...                    

We're never going to have that. See below.

...
> so what place would you redirect people too if they ask for a listing of 
> stuff related to postgresql? and no I don't think a manually maintained  
> "software catalogue" like we have on the website is any/much better.     

There is no single *place* we can redirect people to, nor will there ever 
be moving forward. It's way too late for that. Look at the number of      
Postgres related projects that are *not* on pgf, and ask yourself if      
they will ever migrate back to pgf or its successor (hint: no).           

> What we need is aggregation of information and it is kind of hard to see 
> how we would get that out of any of the existing collab sites (except    
> maybe freshmeat but even that would not work too well). For stuff on pgf
> we essentially get most of the important information for "free" as part
> of people running their projects. Just because we failed to utilize that
> information so far does not mean that the whole concept is flawed.

I think it does indicate just that. How many years has gborg and now
pgfoundry limped along? I agree that we can do better with a central
listing. Rather than the hard to navigate and hard to find software
catalogoue (or however Dave spells it :), let's create a page on the
wiki that lists all interesting and active Postgres related projects.
Not a category, not a set of pages, a single page. There are probably
at most 50 such projects. The inclusion rule would be simple: someone
who cares enough about a particular project can get a wiki account
and add it in themselves. Name, link, short description, done.

In case I'm not clear, I'm also +1 for shutting down pgf at some point.
It's a big jumbled mess of unloved and unfinished projects right now,
with a tiny handful of truly active and useful projects. Cut them all
free, and the survivors will find other homes (e.g. github). I know that's
harsh, but it's 2010 and pgf is still embarassingly bad after all these
years.


- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001051330
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktDhb8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgDcgCbBlXAv8g9DiQPkqf124pbcZyW
N/8AoIdLOkFN7es5Kis1niqoYIC7qAD+
=i0dZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: tribble.postgresql.org - planned maintenance downtime
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs