Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Banck
Subject Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
Date
Msg-id 64980469.1c0a0220.9a5e.f18d@mx.google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:54:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't know whether raising the default would be enough to fix that
> in a nice way, and I certainly don't pretend to have a specific value
> to offer.  But it's undeniable that we have a serious problem here,
> to the point where JIT is a net negative for quite a few people.

Some further data: to my knowledge, most major managed postgres
providers disable jit for their users. Azure certainly does, but I don't
have a Google Cloud SQL or RDS instance running right to verify their
settings. I do seem to remember that they did as well though, at least a
while back.


Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want a hashset type?