Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space"
Date
Msg-id 647d6974-9c52-12f0-0418-055b837401b0@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space"  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/30/20 6:54 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:10 PM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-01-20 06:30, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>> Rebased against 40d964ec997f64227bc0ff5e058dc4a5770a70a9
>>
>> I'm not sure that description of parallel vacuum in the middle of
>> non-full vs. full vacuum is actually that good.
> 
> I have done like that because parallel vacuum is the default.  I mean
> when the user runs vacuum command, it will invoke workers to perform
> index cleanup based on some conditions.
> 
>>   I think those sentences
>> should be moved to a separate paragraph.
> 
> It seems more natural to me to add immediately after vacuum
> explanation, but I might be wrong.  After the above explanation, if
> you still think it is better to move into a separate paragraph, I can
> do that.
Peter, do you still think this should be moved into a separate paragraph?

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Psql patch to show access methods info
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)