Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT .. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Golub
Subject Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT ..
Date
Msg-id 644409343.20140226132010@gf.microolap.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT ..  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello, Robert.

You wrote:

RH> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Rukh Meski <rukh.meski@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> Sorry, I wanted to minimize the attention my message attracts.  I mostly posted it to let people know I plan on
workingon this for 9.5 to avoid duplicated effort.  I will post more documentation and my reasons for wanting this
featurein postgre later, if that's all right.
 

RH> I've wanted this more than once.  I suspect it's a pretty hard project, though.

+1 from me. This is the exciting functionality. There was even a poll
in my blog year ago:
http://pgolub.wordpress.com/2012/11/23/do-we-need-limit-clause-in-update-and-delete-statements-for-postgresql/

So the results were (for those who don't want check the post):
Yes, for functionality: 194 (61.4%)
No way!                 78 (24.7%)
Do not care             44 (13.9%)

RH> -- 
RH> Robert Haas
RH> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
RH> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company





-- 
With best wishes,Pavel                          mailto:pavel@gf.microolap.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Emre Hasegeli
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)