-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Marc wrote:
> I donât have a 1TB database to try it on, mind you, so your
> âwait couple of daysâ might be *with* the âlink option?
I think you mean *without*, but yeah, there is no way the --link
option is going to take that long. Hard links are awesome. We've upgraded
some really big databases, and --link is really, really fast.
If you can't use --link (usually because you want to get over
the checksum hump), we use something like Bucardo to help out.
No need to ever wait a "couple of days" as OP claims. :)
What really bites is the analyze afterwards. That's the part
that takes too long (yes, --in-stages helps some). Would love
to see progress made there.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201607272220
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAleZbGEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiAngCgmsP0O9rMMmu43RQ6LkQJwMtP
IZcAn25UJWNs03q75iIEOVAabKHaBrWV
=zdDO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
