b is often mistaken for beta, and I believe it is already too late, it is
out at the main server?
/Palle
--On Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:26:03 -0500 "Matthew T. O'Connor"
<matthew@zeut.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 March 2004 11:03 am, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>> > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>> > >> Just realized that man pages are not installed. Reason is that
>> > >> doc/man.tar.gz does not exists, but Makefile expects it. instead,
>> > >> there is a doc/man-7.3.tar.gz...
>> > >
>> > > Damn ... its a quick/easy change on my end, but I had an argument
>> > > once way back concerning re-tarring up the distro after being
>> > > released ...
>> > >
>> > > Would take me 5 minutes to do ... should I leave, or re-package?
>> >
>> > I'd say repackage, being careful not to change anything else ...
>>
>> Running the packaging up now ... that is th eonly thing that will change,
>> is the man page tar file being brought in ...
>
> Would it make sense to call it 7.3.6b or some such thing? Seems like a
> straightforward way to handle packaging mistakes.
