Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Date
Msg-id 6425.1472483237@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Also as a note to the idea that we make break things for external user 
> space; the next version being v10 is the exact time to do that.

Let's please drop this meme that "v10 is a great time to break things".
We don't want this to be any worse than any other major-version upgrade.
If we throw thirty different major incompatibilities in at once, we're
going to be hearing about how painful it was for the next decade, even if
any one of them individually would have been manageable.  Or, if we make
the pain factor too high, users will simply not upgrade, and we'll be
faced with demands that we support 9.6 forever.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog