Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i
Date
Msg-id 6419.993252124@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
I said:
> Hm.  Shouldn't psql's \dS ignore temp items, since \d and \di do?

Wait a sec --- I was confusing \dS (display system tables) with \ds
(display sequences).  It looks like the latter should get it right
already.

Possibly it does make sense to suppress temp items in \dS, but there
isn't precedent for it.  We should discuss it on its own merits.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i