On 19/11/2025 12:05, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:52:31AM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Printing the new OldestXID value is incorrectly tied to whether the
>> --next-transaction-id option is given, so this prints it, even though
>> OldestXID is not being modified:
>
> Nice catch!
>
>> This seems to have been an oversight when the --oldest-transaction-id option
>> was added (commit 74cf7d46a91d).
>
> yeah.
>
>> Before that, OldestXID was reset when the
>> --next-transaction-id option was given.
>>
>> Fix attached. Barring objections, I will commit and backpatch this.
>
> LGTM, thanks!
Committed, thanks!
- Heikki
