Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> don't we normally announce if initdb is required on new beta releases? We
> should.
It was sloppy that we didn't do that for beta5, and I apologize for it.
One problem is that we don't have a defined place for per-beta-version
release notes. The current structure of release.sgml doesn't cater for
it --- and I doubt we want to permanently memorialize beta-version
issues anyway. Any thoughts?
regards, tom lane
