Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'll be happier about it when the valgrind buildfarm animals are
>> happy.
> Me too, but it's not clear what the right fix is. One thing that
> would help is if you put in an appearance on the thread where this is
> being discussed and cast a vote. (Ditto to Andres.)
If you mean do I like fixing this by adding a valgrind suppression,
no I do not. Valgrind suppressions are last-resort band-aids IMO,
to be applied only when it's clearly understood what behavior we're
masking and why it's more reasonable to mask it than make it better
defined. I, at least, don't have that understanding from looking
at the thread. For one thing, Peter has not explained why this issue
appears now with parallel index build when it did not before; it's
not like logtape.c isn't old enough to vote.
Even granting that a suppression is the way to fix it, the proposed
suppression seems pretty darn broad, and hence likely to mask things
we'd wish it hadn't.
regards, tom lane
