Re: New functions in sslinfo module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Воронин Дмитрий
Subject Re: New functions in sslinfo module
Date
Msg-id 636781405663952@web15g.yandex.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New functions in sslinfo module  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
Responses Re: New functions in sslinfo module  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<p>Hello, Andreas and others!<br /><br />I make a new version of patch. I corrected your notes for my <span
lang="en"><span>previousversion of patch. Could you test it? Thank you.</span></span><br /><br />03.07.2014, 01:54,
"AndreasKarlsson" <<a href="mailto:andreas@proxel.se">andreas@proxel.se</a>>:<blockquote> On 07/02/2014 02:17 PM,
ВоронинДмитрий wrote:<br /><blockquote>  I apologize, that I am writing this message today. Thank you for testing<br
/>  mypatch!</blockquote> You are welcome!<br /><blockquote>  I will modify functions ssl_extensions(), that it returns
aset (key,<br />  value). Could you get me an example of code those function?</blockquote> You can look at
hstore_each()in hstore_op.c.<br /><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>  - Why are
X509_NAME_field_to_text(),X509_NAME_to_text(),</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>  ASN1_STRING_to_text() and
get_extension()not static? None of these are<br />  a symbol which should be exported.<br
/><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>  Whydo you use pg_do_encoding_conversion() over
pg_any_to_server()?</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>  pg_any_to_server()is implemented using
pg_do_encoding_conversion().<br/><br />  I don't write a code of those functions and I can't answer on your
question.</blockquote> Hm,I thought I saw them changed from static to not in the diff after<br /> applying your patch.
MaybeI just misread the patch.<br /><br /> --<br /> Andreas Karlsson</blockquote><p>-- <br />Best regards, Dmitry
Voronin

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: option -T in pg_basebackup doesn't work on windows
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Portability issues in TAP tests