Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florents Tselai
Subject Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry
Date
Msg-id 635A3C33-74AC-44C1-91E0-155E2D166A72@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 2 Jul 2025, at 10:11 PM, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:37:37PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
Oops, it looks like renaming the test_dsm_registry functions wasn't a good
idea:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2025-07-02%2017%3A11%3A10

Will fix...

Seems to be fixed with commit 0c2b717.


It ocurred to me that no one raised the point for documenting these in xfunc;
I think they should be.


I toolk the liberty of opening a new item & patch for that 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marcos Pegoraro
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?