Re: alternative to PG_CATCH - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: alternative to PG_CATCH
Date
Msg-id 6339394a-cb5b-077f-1e3c-97fcc395b1f4@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: alternative to PG_CATCH  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: alternative to PG_CATCH
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-10-28 13:45, Robert Haas wrote:
> In theory, the do_rethrow variable could conflict with a symbol
> declared in the surrounding scope, but that doesn't seem like it's a
> problem worth getting worked up about.

Right.  A PG_TRY block also declares other local variables for internal 
use without much care about namespacing.  If it becomes a problem, it's 
easy to address.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Add const qualifiers to internal range type APIs
Next
From: Eugen Konkov
Date:
Subject: Does 'instead of delete' trigger support modification of OLD