Re: Rethinking user-defined-typmod before it's too late - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rethinking user-defined-typmod before it's too late
Date
Msg-id 6303.1181928722@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rethinking user-defined-typmod before it's too late  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Rethinking user-defined-typmod before it's too late  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> Would this allow for 'multi-value' typmods for user-defined types?

If you can squeeze them into 31 bits of stored typmod, yes.  That
may mean that you still need the side table (with stored typmod being a
lookup key for the table).  But this gets you out of exposing that
detail to users.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking user-defined-typmod before it's too late
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results