Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Date
Msg-id 6295.1581531322@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I'd just rename the macro to the name of the inline function. No need to
> have a verbose change in all callsites just to update the name imo.

+1, that's what I had in mind too.  That does suggest though that we
ought to make sure the macro has single-eval behavior, so that you
don't need to know it's a macro.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent